A Comparison of Responses of Male and Female High School Graduates to Indicators of Quality of Life and Career Satisfaction |
Contents
Delimitations | 4 |
Significance of the Problem | 7 |
Definition of Terms | 13 |
14 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
05 level additional training attached to participating Average Percent Bernard Career Education Follow-up career preparation Categorized Cedar Rapids high Cedar Rapids schools chi-square test Column Total Comparison of Male contingency table Converse and Rodgers curriculum data which indicate degrees of satisfaction differ in degrees differ in levels difference between males displays the data Education Follow-up Questionnaires educational experience Employment Positions Fasteau Feldman Female Responses females indicated females will differ females would differ Flanagan and Russ-Eft Guttentag and Salasin importance attached Important Not Important Important Row Total job satisfaction Katz level of probability levels of importance long-range career plans males and females males indicated Midwest Research Institute null hypothesis occupational participating in activities person preparation and planning Project Talent Rapids high schools reject the null related to career reported Responses to Satisfaction satisfaction attached satisfied Table training beyond high Type I error vocational women כן