A Descriptive Study of the Ratings of Selected Groups for Secondary Guidance Program Objectives |
Contents
The Role of Evaluation in Guidance Program | 4 |
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE | 11 |
The Value of Accountability in Guidance | 14 |
9 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
ability and achievement ability and interests above-average in importance above-average rating accountability and evaluation Administrators Counselors Parents Average Importance Moderate Brown Deer cards chosen educational goals chosen field consumers of guidance Counselors Parents Students difference was found educational and vocational examine and express gave this objective group mean ratings groups gave groups rated Guidance Objective GUIDANCE PROGRAM OBJECTIVES guidance services high school guidance highest and lowest identify Importance Average Importance Importance Moderate Importance Important 5 Unimportant Knowledge of personal level of ability lowest mean rating lowest rating Marginal Importance Administrators Marginal Importance Average Marginal Importance Figure mean ratings given objective an above-average Parents Students Teachers participating personal traits procedures Ratings for Guidance ratings of 4.0 school districts school guidance programs social groups student behavior Student has knowledge Students Teachers Marginal Students Teachers Unimportant Teachers Marginal Importance Unimportant Administrators Unimportant Marginal Importance vocational plans