An Evaluation of Fiscal Year 1968 Special Impact Programs, Volume 7 |
Common terms and phrases
age and sex analysis answer yes attitudes toward police Awareness of SIP Bedford-Stuyvesant C-2 Snowball Leaders C-3 Rural Responses Carolina N=200 census Central Los Angeles Cleveland East Los Angeles ELA SCLA HOUGH expected feel sympathy ghetto Greenpoint grievances groups HOUGH BED-STUY RESPONSE HOUGH KENTUCKY N. C. Hough participants interviewed join a disturbance KENTUCKY N. C. N=42 Leaders ELA SCLA leadership structure less migration militance neighborhood North Carolina participants null hypothesis number of persons OOO OOO OOOO participant sample Participants ELA SCLA percent in Hough percentage population problems proportion questionnaire questions resident sample residential sample RESIDENTS LEADERS PARTICI riot ideology rural areas SCLA HOUGH BED-STUY SCLA HOUGH KENTUCKY simple random sample SIP agency SIP participants SIP programs snowball sample South Central South Central Los Special Impact Program stage Strongly agree Strongly Disagree sympathy for disturbances Table target area tension urban areas voting young males zero-stage ΝΑ