Comparing Glasshouse and Field Pesticide Performance II: Proceedings of an International Symposium Organised by the SCI Pesticides Group in Collaboration with the British Crop Protection Council and Held at the University of Kent, Canterbury on 12-14 April 1994, Volume 2H. G. Hewitt |
Contents
SESSION | 17 |
JP GRIME | 35 |
Factors involved in apparent discrepancies of fungicide performance | 47 |
Copyright | |
20 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
1994 BCPC MONOGRAPH adjuvants Agricultural algae application Applied Biology Aspects of Applied assessment bioassay biological activity biological control Boxworth carbofuran chemical COMPARING GLASSHOUSE competition compounds concentration conidia crop density cypermethrin degradation disease droplet distribution effects efficacy Elymus repens environment evaluation experimental experiments field conditions field performance FIELD PESTICIDE PERFORMANCE field trials Figure flumetsulam formulation fungicides glasshouse GLASSHOUSE & FIELD glasshouse and field glyphosate growth herbicide herbicide activity host humidity increased influence inoculum insecticides insects interaction isoproturon laboratory and field laboratory studies lantana larvae leaf Lolium rigidum metabolism moisture MONOGRAPH NO 59 nicosulfuron nozzles parameters pathogens pest pesticide phloem photodegradation phytotoxicity plant plots potential prediction production PTFE pyrethroid relative residues screening semiochemicals simulated soil species sporulation spray sprayer strobilurin Suett surface surfactant susceptible Table target temperature terbufos translocation treatment triazoles untreated uptake vapour variability virescens weed control weed density wheat