Differences in Water Use Rates Between Four Broadleafed Woody Tree Species |
Contents
REVIEW OF RELEVANT LITERATURE | 4 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS | 36 |
557 | 71 |
Copyright | |
6 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
actual leaf area Amelanchier amount analysis area per leaf August calculated camera canopy cm² coefficients compared conducted container contrast correlation crown dates decrease demand density described determined developed digitizing effect established estimate experiment factors Figure fitted four four species Fraxinus growth higher increased indicated individual interaction intercept larger leaf area leaf surface area leaf temperature leaflets leaves length lens less levels light linear lower mean area measurements method multiple negatives noted obtained pan evaporation percent photographs plant potential predictive problem produce range rates ratio reading reduced regression equation relationship relative resistance resolution roots sample season significant significantly slopes smaller soil soil volumes soil water Sophora species stomatal Table taken techniques Tilia total leaf area transpiration tree species tree water loss values variability volume weight whole tree water woody