Earnings Top-up Evaluation: Effects on Low-paid Workers, Part 1 |
Contents
Summary | 1 |
Table 3 | 3 |
Examining wage and substitution effects using | 5 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
16 hours 43 per cent administrative data analysis average weekly aware of ETU Bournemouth Castleford cent compared cent in Scheme claiming ETU Column percentages Control areas differences disability Doncaster earnings threshold Earnings Top-up eligible for ETU eligible non-recipients eligible workers employees entitlement to ETU ETU area ETU pilot Family Credit FC recipients Figure five per cent follow-up survey half higher hourly wage hours a week hours per week Housing Benefit housing tenure income ineligible interview introduction of ETU job retention JSA entrants labour market less living lone mothers low-paid workers months National Minimum Wage one-third overall paid workers partner pilot areas pilot scheme proportion qualifications receiving ETU recipients by ETU Research Scheme A Scheme Scheme B areas Section self-employed September 1999 slightly Social Security Statistical Enquiry status substitution effect Sunderland surveys of ETU Table take-up rate tenants unemployed Unweighted base variables weekly wage workers-in-work young single