Electronic Warfare: Costly Radar Warning Receiver Duplication Continues : Report to the Chairman, Legislation and National Security Subcommittee, Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives |
Common terms and phrases
achieving commonality Achieving RWR Commonality Acquire and Upgrade Acquired in 1987 acquisition cost Air Force's Army attack aircraft B-1B bomber based on cost best RWR bomber aircraft Committee on Government Common Electronic Warfare common RWR Commonality for Fixed-Wing commonality is achieved Commonality Is Feasible conferees Continue to Acquire cost and effectiveness cost-effective cost-effectiveness analysis Defense for Acquisition Defense select DOD policy DOD's stated commitment Electronic Warfare System existing Air Force fighter and attack Fixed-Wing Fighter fixed-wing tactical fighter Force and Navy future aircraft future-generation aircraft GAO recommendations Government Operations helicopters and special House Committee Integrated Electronic Warfare joint analysis Legislation and National logistics Marine Corps Matters for Congressional maximum common maximum practical RWR military services National Security Subcommittee Navy's Need for Common practical RWR commonality Progress in Achieving promote commonality Radar Warning Receiver RWR capability RWR systems Secretary of Defense separate RWR programs special purpose aircraft threat upgrade RWRS
Popular passages
Page 13 - States, before the Legislation and National Security Subcommittee, House Committee on Government Operations, September 26, 1986; and GAO comments on S.
Page 10 - RWRS sense the signal from hostile radars, provide an audio warning signal to the pilot, and display the warning information on a video screen in the aircraft cockpit.
Page 13 - Air Force and Navy Are Still Proliferating Radar Warning Receivers That Duplicate Each Other, House Report 100-331 (Oct.
Page 13 - Defense select the best RWR, based on cost and effectiveness, for maximum common use on existing Air Force and Navy tactical aircraft and stop those RWR programs that could not be demonstrated to be cost-effective.