‘Facebookers’ vs. ‘Donor Darlings’: The distortion of reality in the depiction of the Egypt revolution in 2011 by the use of social media activists as journalistic sources.Research Paper (undergraduate) from the year 2011 in the subject Cultural Studies - European Studies, Maastricht University, language: English, abstract: When the Dutch journalist Joris Luyendijk first published his book Hello Everybody in 2006 , Facebook was only at the beginning of its rise to the mass-medium that it is today. The same applies for Twitter. It was only at its starting point; with its launch in July 2006 (Crunchbase, 2011) it had significantly less than 12,000 users in November 2006. Consequently, journalists adapted the methodology of their work to these new forms of social (mass) communication. A study by the George Washington University (USA) in cooperation with the public relations company Cision confirms this assumption. Sixty-five percent of all journalists examined said that they used Social networks as sources for their daily work (Bates & Sullivan, 2010). This indicates that also the way of reporting about the Middle East might have changed; that correspondents adapted to the new tools which they got and use them actively for their reporting. One of the most prominent journalistic pieces on the revolution in Egypt which used sources from the social media landscape in order to reconstruct the course of the Egyptian revolution is the BBC documentary “How Facebook Changed the World” (Husain, 2011), first broadcasted on 5 September 2011 on BBC 2 (BBC, 2011). This paper examines, firstly, the problems a researcher is confronted with writing about journalist’s source mix in order to explain the paper’s specific approach to the topic. Secondly, the paper investigates the role of social media in journalism, how the use of social media as a source is legitimized and how much credibility is given to social media as sources by journalists. Thirdly, the use of social media as sources is considered, using the example of the BBC documentary in order to lastly analyse the advantages and disadvantages of social media in journalist’s source mix. For this purpose the analysis of Luyendijk is taken as a basis. This paper only focuses on the part about the Egyptian revolution in the documentary; all other parts are not subjects of the analysis. |
Common terms and phrases
Activists as Narrators adapted appearance in Social April 6 Youth Asmaa BBC documentary blogger blogs bypassing censorship Changed The World citizens connectors dictatorships Dissident distort the realities draft Egypt Egyptian revolution essay examined example Facebook Changed Facebook page filter of fear Firstly Ghazali-Harb gives voice governments HubSpot Human-rights activists Husain important to note internet users interviewee introduced by showing Investigating the role Invisibility of Sources Iranian Issue of Credibility journalist’s source mix journalistic material journalistic sources Luyendijk describes Luyendijk mentions Maikel Nabil Sanad Media as journalistic Media as sources Middle East monitoring Negm online activism opinion polls order to explain paper focuses political activists problem that Luyendijk protagonists protests public opinion published question to ask Reporters Without Borders Retrieved October revolutionary role as Social seemed logical Social Media activists Social Media landscape therewith Thirdly topic traditional communications methods traditional media Twitter Western countries word of mouth