Immigration Detention: Law, History, Politics

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, Oct 27, 2011 - Political Science
The liberal legal ideal of protection of the individual against administrative detention without trial is embodied in the habeas corpus tradition. However, the use of detention to control immigration has gone from a wartime exception to normal practice, thus calling into question modern states' adherence to the rule of law. Daniel Wilsher traces how modern states have come to use long-term detention of immigrants without judicial control. He examines the wider emerging international human rights challenge presented by detention based upon protecting 'national sovereignty' in an age of global migration. He explores the vulnerable political status of immigrants and shows how attempts to close liberal societies can create 'unwanted persons' who are denied fundamental rights. To conclude, he proposes a set of standards to ensure that efforts to control migration, including the use of detention, conform to principles of law and uphold basic rights regardless of immigration status.
 

Contents

from free movement to regulated borders in America and the United Kingdom
1
2 Modern immigration detention and the rise of the permanent bureaucratic enterprise
57
between territorial sovereignty and emerging human rights norms
119
redefining friends and enemies
171
the problem of internment in peacetime
207
6 Global migration and the politics of immigration detention
256
placing boundaries around detention
310
Bibliography
355
Index
377
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2011)

Daniel Wilsher is a senior lecturer in law at City Law School, London and a part-time immigration judge in the Immigration and Asylum Chamber, First Tier Tribunal.

Bibliographic information