Implementation of the USA PATRIOT Act: Effect of Sections 203(b) and (d) on Information Sharing : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, First Session, April 19, 2005 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ACLU agents Al Qaeda allowed Amendment American Civil Liberties Attorney authorizes the sharing BAGINSKI Chairman Civil Liberties Union COBLE Committee concerned CONG CONGRESS THE LIBRARY counterintelligence crime Criminal Division criminal investigation DELAHUNT Director disclosure EDGAR ensure FBI's files FISA warrant foreign government foreign intelligence information foreign power gentleman GOHMERT going grand jury GRESS guidelines hearing Homeland Security information sharing provisions intel intelligence agencies Intelligence Community involved Judiciary Justice Department law enforcement LIBR LIBRARY CONGRESS LIBRARY OF CONGRES LIBRARY OF CONGRESS ligence LUNGREN MCCAUL Muslim National Counterterrorism Center national security officials NCTC Northern Virginia Okay organizations Osama bin Laden oversight probable cause prosecutors protect raids requirement roving wiretap SABIN SCOTT search warrants section 203 seized shar share information SHEILA JACKSON LEE Subcommittee sunset surveillance talking terrorist attack testimony Texas Thank threat tion Title III information USA PATRIOT Act wall Wen Ho Lee wiretap
Popular passages
Page 25 - Scott and Members of the Subcommittee: I am pleased to appear before you today on behalf of the American...
Page 7 - Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective and throwing every resource we had at certain 'problems.
Page 67 - State is not free to adopt whatever procedures it pleases for dealing with obscenity . . . without regard to the possible consequences for constitutionally protected speech.
Page 9 - The confrontation that we are calling for with the apostate regimes does not know Socratic debates, platonic ideals, nor Aristotelian diplomacy. But it knows the dialogue of bullets, the ideals of assassination, bombing, and destruction, and the diplomacy of the cannon and machine gun.
Page 70 - domestic security" is said to be involved here does not draw this case outside the mainstream of Fourth Amendment law. Rather, the recurring desire of reigning officials to employ dragnet techniques to intimidate their critics lies at the core of that prohibition. For it was such excesses as the use of general warrants and the writs of assistance that led to the ratification of the Fourth Amendment. In Entick v. Carrington, 19 How.
Page 68 - Stanford's books returned is that "the constitutional requirement that warrants must particularly describe the 'things to be seized' is to be accorded the most scrupulous exactitude when the 'things
Page 2 - Mr. Bobby Scott. Mr. SCOTT. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am pleased to join you in convening the hearing on HR 3179, "the Anti-Terrorism Intelligence Tools Improvement Act of 2003.
Page 70 - National security cases often reflect a convergence of First and Fourth Amendment values not present in cases of 'ordinary' crime. Thourji the Investigative duty of the executive may be stronger in such cases, so also is there greater Jeopardy to constitutionally protected speech...
Page 22 - Counterintelligence means information gathered and activities conducted to protect against espionage, other intelligence activities, sabotage, or assassinations conducted for or on behalf of foreign powers, organizations or persons, or international terrorist activities, but not including personnel, physical, document or communications security programs.
Page 69 - No less a standard could be faithful to First Amendment freedoms. The constitutional impossibility of leaving the protection of those freedoms to the whim of the officers charged with executing the warrant is dramatically underscored by what the officers saw fit to seize under the warrant in this case.