Implementing User Fees at Public Parks and Recreation AreasFood and Resource Economics Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 1982 - Parks |
Common terms and phrases
AC when AC aesthetic qualities allowed to function assess break-even cash grants ceteris paribus charge commit the Fallacy cost per user cost tracking Crime Rate decreased total revenue demand curve drive the price Ellerbrock EQUILIBRIUM excess revenues Fallacy of Composition FEES AT PUBLIC Florida Food and Resource Gainesville Georgia illustrated IMPLEMENTING USER FEES income increase Marginal Benefits MARGINAL COST PRICING Marginal Costs MB marginal revenue Nobel laureate operating a facility operations and maintenance opportunity costs optimal level PARKS & RECREATION/JANUARY Parks and Recreation price-elasticity of demand PROFIT MAXIMIZATION PUBLIC PARKS public pie public recreation Quantity FIGURE quantity supplied RECREATION AREAS recreation demand analysis recreation profession recreation resources Recreation Service RECREATION/JANUARY 1982 Resource Economics Department revenue for inelastic Southeastern Council subsidized sumers supplied is represented supply curves tend to drive tion U.S. Department unchanged total revenue unitary elasticity University of Florida utility value of recreation value to human visitation rates