Improving Pennsylvania's Criminal Justice System Through Upgraded Standards and Goals: A Survey of Pennsylvania Criminal Justice "Managers" to Determine Attitudes and Reactions to Standards Recommended by the National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals |
Contents
Selection of standards respondent groups and issues | 4 |
Analysis of questionnaire Responses | 9 |
Table IVD | |
Common terms and phrases
Allegheny County assignment for implementation Average Ratings clearly and adequately Commission on Criminal correction standards corrections area Council By Type court standards Courts Corrections Community Criminal Justice Standards criminal justice system decrease in crime decrease system costs degree of conformity degree of resistance district attorneys Dwight L F4a F4b F4c F4b F4c F4d Fl F2 F3 gave highest ratings gave the highest gave the lowest Group Implementation Factors high variance implementation of standards improved fairness improved rehabilitation potential Justice System Police low to high Mayors mentation National Advisory Commission officials and RPC Pennsylvania criminal justice Pennsylvania practice conforms police chiefs Police Courts Corrections potential or reduce priority assignment public defenders Reason for Priority reduction in crime Regional Planning Council Respondent Group Implementation Respondents 43 Respondents Fl F2 RPC citizen members South Central region Southwest region Standards and Goals Standards By Respondent standards implementation survey System Police Courts Type of Standard