Management Deficiencies in Environmental Enforcement: "forceless Enforcement" : Hearing Before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, First Session, June 19, 1991 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative penalties Administrator for Enforcement Agency's air pollution areas assessed penalties Assistant Administrator audits Avtex Fibers benefit and gravity benefit of noncompliance Chesapeake Bay Program civil judicial civil penalty policy Clean Air Act Clean Water Act compliance and enforcement criminal cross-media data integration delegated delegated programs documentation economic benefit penalty economic benefit policies efforts enforcement actions enforcement program ensure environmental enforcement environmental laws Environmental Protection EPA Administrator EPA enforcement EPA Inspector EPA Penalties EPA regions EPA's facilities federal final penalty fiscal year 1990 guidance hazardous waste HEMBRA IDEA implementation industrial information systems initial issues John Glenn LUDWISZEWSKI ment million monitoring NPDES Office of Enforcement oversight penalty amounts penalty assessments penalty practices percent permit Pretreatment Program problems Program EPA-IG program offices RCRA recommendation Recover Economic Benefits regional offices require responsible Senator LIEBERMAN significant Stationary Source STROCK Superfund Toxic Substances United States Senate violations Virginia
Popular passages
Page 45 - Statement of Richard L. Hembra, Director Environmental Protection Issues Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division Before the Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources Subcommittee Committee on Government Operations House of Representatives GAO/T-RCED-90-**3 i 1W (IS/IT) Mr.
Page 138 - Act (CERCLA) and active air and water releases covered under the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
Page 4 - Richard L. Hembra Director Environmental Protection Issues Resources, Community and Economic Development Division US General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 Dear Mr.
Page 147 - EPA requires companies to test selected existing chemicals for toxic effects and requires the agency to review most new chemicals before they are manufactured. To prevent unreasonable...
Page 47 - Because penalties should serve as a deterrent to violators and should ensure that regulated entities are treated fairly and consistently, it has been EPA's policy since 1984 that penalties for significant violations of environmental regulations be at least as great as the amount by which a company would benefit by not being in compliance.
Page 114 - Appropriate penalties were either not calculated and assessed at all, or inadequately calculated. Also, calculated penalties were reduced during negotiations, in some cases in excess of 90 percent and amounting to Billions of dollars, with little or no documentation to support the reductions. In many cases the financial benefits the violators received from delayed or avoided costs were not recovered.
Page 65 - Protecting Human Health and the Environment Through Improved Management (GAO/RCED-88-101, Aug. 16, 1988) relates to EPA07.
Page 109 - DOE's operations into compliance with environmental laws such as the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. The...
Page 19 - I am concerned about is that, by drafting the bill to amend both the Clean Water Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the jurisdictional wrangling by these committees is going to be perpetuated almost ad infinitum.
Page 228 - I hope this information is helpful to you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.