Nuclear Weapons in U. S. National Security Policy: Past, Present, and ProspectsContents: (1) Introduction; (2) Nuclear Weapons in U.S. National Security Policy: The Evolving Role of Nuclear Weapons; Need for a National Debate?; (3) Defining Deterrence: Deterrence, in Theory; Deterrence, During the Cold War; Deterrence, After the Cold War; Deterrence in the 21st Century; (4) Issues for Congress: How Much Has Nuclear Strategy Changed?; Does Tailored Deterrence Enhance the Credibility of Nuclear Deterrence or Increase the Risk of Nuclear Use?; Can Tailored Deterrence Provide Guidance in Determining the Size and Structure of the U.S. Nuclear Arsenal?; What Role for U.S. Nuclear Weapons? |
Common terms and phrases
ability According actions Administration’s adversary’s allies analysts Annual Report argued Armed Services attack options attack plans believe Bush Administration capabilities challenge changed Cold Cold War Command concept Congress contingencies conventional costs credible debate Department of Defense deployed destroy deterrent threat develop differs discussion doctrine emerging enhance example February focus force structure Further future global growing House identify indicated Issues January July limited maintain March mass destruction military National Security Strategy Nonproliferation noted nuclear deterrent nuclear forces Nuclear Posture Review operational possible potential adversaries President programs Quadrennial questions range reduce Report requirements response retaliation role of nuclear Russia Secretary of Defense seeking Senate SIOP sought Soviet Union specific statement strategic deterrence Strategic Nuclear strike sufficient tailored deterrence threat threaten types U.S. Department U.S. deterrent U.S. national security U.S. nuclear weapons U.S. Strategic United valued war plans warheads Washington weapons in U.S. weapons of mass