Project on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct: Report on Workshop Number One : the Woods, Hedgesville, West Virginia, September 18-20, 1987 |
Contents
Workshop Summary Rosemary Chalk | 1 |
Deception in Scientific Research Patricia K Woolf | 37 |
An Analysis of Fraud and Misconduct in Science Warren Schmaus | 87 |
3 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
academic accused of misconduct action allegations of misconduct allegations of research alleged misconduct argued Association Biomedical cell cultures charges coauthor committee Conference of Lawyers Darsee detected disclosure discussions due process Emilio Q ethical evidence experience fabrication factors faculty member false falsification fraud and misconduct Fraud in Science funding agencies guidelines handling allegations handling misconduct Harvard Harvard Medical School Hedgesville Hogan & Hartson incidence of misconduct individual initial inquiry Institutes of Health intentional deceit intentional misrepresentation involved journal editors laboratory Lawyers and Scientists Mark Frankel Medical School Medicine misconduct in science Mitchell II National Institutes NCLS negligent misrepresentation notified Office paper peer review plagiarism policies and procedures practices problems professional societies publicly reported published question research fraud research institutions research misconduct responsibility retraction Ronald Breslow sanctions scientific community scientific fraud scientific misconduct scientific research serious standards Stanford Straus Summerlin Technology violations whistleblowers workshop participants