Sexual Orientation and Human RightsWhat rights govern heterosexual and homosexual behaviors? Two distinguished philosophers debate this important issue in Sexual Orientation and Human Rights. Laurence M. Thomas argues that a society which has the constitutional resources to protect hate groups can protect homosexuals without valorizing the homosexual life-style. He defends the view that the Bible cannot warrant the venom that, in the name of religion, is often expressed against homosexuals. Michael E. Levin defends the unorthodox view that the aversion some people experience toward homosexuality deserves respect. He further argues that while homosexuals enjoy the same rights as others to be free of violence and discrimination, they do not have more extensive rights. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abomination adaptive adults argue argument behavior believe benefit Bible biblical text biological blacks certainly child Christian civil rights civil rights law claim committed defined definition difference discrimination dislike environment essay evolutionary explains fact fellatio female find first fitness freedom function gay genes gay pride gene pool genetic groups harm harm principle hate heart heterosexual hit baseballs homo homosexual acts homosexual marriage human idea individuals instance institutions intercourse issue Jewish Jews justified Ku Klux Klan Laura Schlessinger lesbians liberationists lifestyle lives maladaptive male homosexuality married matter Mill’s moral mosexuals murder nature neo-Nazi nonrational preferences normal one’s oral sex parents person promiscuity protect question racism reason reflect regard religious reproductive sexual abuse sexual lovemaking sexual orientation sexual preference significant social society specific suppose surely testosterone things tion tolerance traits University Press unnatural valorizing women wrong