Wasteful Ordering Practices in the Department of Defense Supply System: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, First Session, April 23, 1991, Volume 4

Front Cover
 

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 72 - The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management Committee on Governmental Affairs United States Senate Dear Mr. Chairman...
Page 46 - Chairman, this concludes my prepared statement. We will be happy to respond to any questions you may have.
Page 6 - If you would like, we would put your entire statement in the record and you can summarize it.
Page 98 - United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 National Security and International Affaire Division B-206613 June 26, 1987 The Honorable Les Aspin Chairman, Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives Dear Mr.
Page 102 - If you or your staff have any questions, I can be reached on (202) 2684854.
Page 80 - Defense direct the Director, DLA, to determine the cost of filling a requisition and levy a minimum charge per requisition when the percentage surcharge based on the value of the item is not sufficient to recover this cost and determine the additional cost for processing high priority requisitions and charge customers for this service.
Page 6 - Senator LEVIN. Thank you, Senator Cohen. Our first panel is made up of...
Page 74 - Specifically, customers placed numerous lowvalue requisitions that cost DLA more to fill than the value of the supplies provided...
Page 103 - DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN : This is in response to your letter of April 20, 1972, to Secretary Laird concerning hearings on May 1, 2 and 3 on S. 3404, a bill to amend the Cargo Preference Act of 1954 for certain purposes. The Secretary of Defense has designated the Department of the Navy to represent the Department of Defense on this bill, and I have been asked to reply to your letter directly. This bill would affect other executive agencies to a greater extent than the Department of Defense, and it is understood...

Bibliographic information