Wisconsin's Wildlife Constituency Study: Phase II, Results of a Statewide Mailed Questionnaire, Report ICooperative Extension Service, University of Wisconsin--Extension, 1988 - Wildlife conservation - 66 pages |
Contents
Methods | 3 |
Recreational Crowding | 32 |
Table of Contents continued | 35 |
1 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
addition alternative animal areas associations better birds circle commitment concern consider consumptive users contributions crowded deer definitely developed dollars education programs enjoy equipment favorite feeding fishing frequencies friends funding greatest hunters hunting important increase indicate initiation interest issues Lastly least levels limiting factor live majority Mean miles motivations nature needs non-users nonconsumptive activity nonconsumptive recreation nonconsumptive wildlife observation outdoor participation percent possible preferred presented probably public lands public wildlife lands pure consumptive Pure Noncon pure nonconsumptive users questions ratings reason residence respondents sales tax satisfaction settings signs social specific strongly substitutes sumptive Dual Users sumptive Pure Noncon Table trails trapping types of wildlife user groups users and dual visiting volunteer Weighted Pure wild wildlife activity wildlife lands wildlife management wildlife program wildlife properties wildlife recreations wildlife users Wisconsin