Grading Education: Getting Accountability Right
Economic Policy Institute, 2008 - Education - 263 pages
Yes, we should hold public schools accountable for effectively spending the vast funds with which they have been entrusted. But accountability policies like No Child Left Behind, based exclusively on math and reading test scores, have narrowed the curriculum, misidentified both failing and successful schools, and established irresponsible expectations for what schools can accomplish.
Instead of just grading progress in one or two narrow subjects, we should hold schools accountable for the broad outcomes we expect from public education, basic knowledge and skills, critical thinking, an apreciation of the arts, physical and emotional health, and preparation for skilled employment. Then we should develop the means to measure and ensure schools' success in achieving them. Grading Education describes a new kind of accountability plan for public education, one that relies on higher-quality testing, focusses on professional evaluation, and builds on capacities we already possess.
3 pages matching narrowed curriculum in this book
Results 1-3 of 3
What people are saying - Write a review
Review: Grading Education: Getting Accountability RightUser Review - Kameron - Goodreads
I would suggest that anyone who has anything to do with education policy at the local, state, and national level read this book, but as Rothstein points out, the lack of sophistication in our current ... Read full review
Review: Grading Education: Getting Accountability RightUser Review - Marissa Morrison - Goodreads
Hindsight is 20/20, but even still it's hard to understand how our elected representatives allowed No Child Left Behind to get created in the first place. Rothstein provides dozens of reasons why it ... Read full review
Weighting the goals of public education
14 other sections not shown