Habits of the heart: individualism and commitment in American life

Front Cover
Harper & Row, 1985 - Social Science - 355 pages
22 Reviews
"The contemporary benchmark from which to look back and look forward in the continuing inquiry about American character."--Daniel Bell"One of the most penetrating examinations of American individualism I have seen. . . . I hope it will be read and debated for years."--Christopher Lasch, author of "The Culture of Narcissism

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

User ratings

5 stars
4
4 stars
7
3 stars
6
2 stars
0
1 star
5

Review: Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life

User Review  - Nils - Goodreads

A canonical text of American sociology in the 1980s, sure to be at the center of reading lists about the 1980s. A quintessential examination of the mental space of middle class white America, in the ... Read full review

Review: Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life

User Review  - Shannon Donovan - Goodreads

extremely white protestant centric. The book suggests that we should all be more protestant..... Read full review

Contents

The Pursuit of Happiness
3
PARTONE PRIVATE LIFE
44
PARTTWO PUBLIC LIFE
157
Copyright

3 other sections not shown

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (1985)

Robert N. Bellah, an American sociologist, received his Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1955 and teaches at the University of California at Berkeley. He is best known for his work on community and religion. Although he has written on religions in nonwestern cultures, he has focused much of his research on the notion of civil religion in the West. To Bellah, American society confronts a moral dilemma whereby communalism competes with individualism for domination. His most important book, Habits of the Heart (1985), considers the American character and the decline of community. Bellah holds that the radical split between knowledge and commitment is untenable and can result only in a stunted personal and intellectual growth. He argues for a social science guided by communal values.