Primary Stimulus Generalization and Secondary Extinction as a Function of Strength of Conditioning of a Conditioned Avoidance Response |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 4
Page 20
... Square F Strength of conditioning 3 4706 21.41 ** Subgroup 3 5736 26.10 ** ** C x SG 9 953 4.34 48 220 63 Error Total of variance at the .01 level . imately proportional , a square root transformation was applied to the data . The ...
... Square F Strength of conditioning 3 4706 21.41 ** Subgroup 3 5736 26.10 ** ** C x SG 9 953 4.34 48 220 63 Error Total of variance at the .01 level . imately proportional , a square root transformation was applied to the data . The ...
Page 22
... square root transformation . These data are shown in Figure 4. The results of this analysis are shown below in Table 8. The differences indicated Table 8 Analysis of square root total responses to extinction criterion in phase 3 Source ...
... square root transformation . These data are shown in Figure 4. The results of this analysis are shown below in Table 8. The differences indicated Table 8 Analysis of square root total responses to extinction criterion in phase 3 Source ...
Page 23
... Square root of total responses to extinction criterion in phase 3. These are the same data shown in Figure 3 except for the square root transformation . experiment . The means fall into two groups - the 23 . MEAN SQUARE ROOT OF RESPONSES ..
... Square root of total responses to extinction criterion in phase 3. These are the same data shown in Figure 3 except for the square root transformation . experiment . The means fall into two groups - the 23 . MEAN SQUARE ROOT OF RESPONSES ..
Common terms and phrases
05 level 20 trials acquis acquisition levels Analysis of variance avoidance conditioning Bartlett's test Bass and Hull Brogden cage-turning response cent relative classical conditioning conditioned reflex conditioned responses Conditioning Group Phase conditioning level conditioning situation conditioning wheel day's testing decreases with level df Mean Square ditioning DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Duncan Range test extinction criterion extinction scores extinguished failure to respond function of strength given extinction training goal box Hullian instrumental avoidance level of acquisition level of conditioning level of significance mean number measure msec non-response extinction null hypothesis number of responses Pavlov Phase 1 Subgroup Phase 2 Phase Psychol reinforcing relative primary stimulus resistance to secondary responses to extinction shock shown in Table Source df Mean Square F Strength square root transformation strength of conditioning studies Subgroup CP Subgroup E-500 test tone thesis Thompson 24 tinction total responses University of Wisconsin Wait 2 days