What people are saying - Write a review
Other editions - View all
aberration according accuracy approximate value ascending node auxiliary angle auxiliary quantity axis calculation celestial sphere circle Clog coefficients comets computed conic sections conveniently corrected value corresponding cos2 cotan deduced denote derived determined difference differential distance earth eccentric anomaly eccentricity ecliptic elements ellipse equal equation error evident example expressed former fundamental plane geocentric place given h logyy heavenly body heliocentric motion heliocentric place Hence hyperbola hyperbolic motion inclination intersection intervals known lastly latter Log diff log Q logarithm LogE logr longitude and latitude longitude in orbit manner mean anomaly moreover negative nutation observed places obtained parabola parallax perihelion perturbations plane preceding article precision problem radii radius vector readily reduced referred regarded remaining right ascension right line roots satisfied sin2 sin4 sine solution substituted taken tan2 third tion true anomaly unknown quantities whence Wherefore wholly
Page 260 - Therefore, that will be the most probable system of values of the unknown quantities p, q, r, s, etc., in which the sum of the squares of the differences between the observed and computed values of the functions V, V, V", etc. is a minimum, if the same degree of accuracy is to be presumed in all the observations.
Page 249 - ... all computations made concerning concrete phenomena must be to approximate, as nearly as practicable, to the truth. But this can be accomplished in no other way than by a suitable combination of more observations than the number absolutely requisite for the determination of the unknown quantities. This problem can only be properly undertaken when an approximate knowledge of the orbit has been already attained, which is afterwards to be corrected so as to satisfy all the observations in the most...
Page xiv - Some ideas occurred to me in the month of September of the year 1801, engaged at the time on a very different subject, which seemed to point to the solution of the great problem of which I have spoken. Under such circumstances we not unfrequently, for fear of being too much led away by an attractive investigation, suffer the associations of ideas, which, more attentively considered, might have proved most fruitful in results, to be lost from neglect. And the same fate might have befallen these conceptions...
Page 249 - If the astronomical observations and other quantities, on which the computations of orbits is based, were absolutely correct, the elements also, whether deduced from three or four observations, would be strictly accurate (so far indeed as the motion is supposed to take place exactly according to the laws of Kepler), and, therefore, if other observations were used, they might be confirmed but not corrected. But since all our measurements and observations are nothing more than approximations to the...
Page xv - I ever have found a more seasonable opportunity to test the practical value of my conceptions, than now in employing them for the determination of the orbit of the planet Ceres, which during these forty-one days had described a geocentric arc of only three degrees, and after the lapse of a year must be looked for in a region of the heavens very remote from that in which it was last seen? This first application of the method was made in the month of October, 1801, and the first clear night, when the...
Page 260 - the most probable value of the unknown quantities will be that in which the sum of the squares of the differences between the actually observed and the computed values multiplied by numbers that measure the degree of precision is a minimum".
Page 260 - ... a double error can be committed in the former system with the same facility as a single error in the latter, in which case, according to the common way of speaking, a double degree of precision is attributed to the latter observations.”” The fact of the matter is, however, that: “. . . different fields have particularly favorite ways of expressing precision. Most of these measures are multiples of the standard deviation; it is not always clear which multiple is meant. . “Some consider...
Page 258 - ... base, the common principle, the excellence of which is generally acknowledged, depends. It has been customary certainly to regard as an axiom the hypothesis that if any quantity has been determined by several direct observations, made under the same circumstances and with equal care, the arithmetical mean of the observed values affords the most probable value, if not rigorously, yet very nearly at least, so that it is always most safe to adhere to it. By putting, therefore, V = V = V
Page 259 - ... probability of errors exceeding those limits ought always to be zero. while our formula always gives some value. However, this defect, which every analytical function must, from its nature, labor under, is of no importance in practice, because the value of our function decreases so rapidly, when h Л has acquired a considerable magnitude, that it can safely be considered as vanishing.
From Google Scholar
Warren E Stewart, Mike Caracotsios, Jan P Sorensen - 1992 - AIChE Journal
Ernest D Eason - 1976 - International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
All Scholar search results »
RD Rabbitt, JA Weiss, GE Christensen, MI Miller