Original Intent: The Courts, the Constitution & Religion

Front Cover
WallBuilder Press, 2000 - History - 534 pages
25 Reviews
In their own words, the Supreme Court has become "a national theology board," "a super board of education," and amateur psychologists on a "psycho-journey." The result has been a virtual rewriting of the liberties enumerated in the Constitution. A direct victim of this judicial micromanagement has been the religious aspect of the First Amendment. For example, the Court now interprets that Amendment under: a "Lemon Test" absurdly requiring religious expression to be secular; an "Endorsement Test" pursuing an impossible neutrality between religion and secularism; and a "Psychological Coercion Test" allowing a single dissenter to silence an entire community's religious expression. Additional casualties of judicial activism have included protections for State's rights, local controls, separation of powers, legislative supremacy, and numerous other constitutional provisions. Why did earlier Courts protect these powers for generations, and what has caused their erosion by contemporary Courts? - Back cover.

What people are saying - Write a review

User ratings

5 stars
17
4 stars
3
3 stars
2
2 stars
1
1 star
2

Review: Original Intent: The Courts, the Constitution, & Religion

User Review  - Larry Killion - Goodreads

Original Intent. By David Barton. This is a very important book for people of faith to read regarding what has happened to the religious climate of public modern America. Unbelieving haters of ... Read full review

Review: Original Intent: The Courts, the Constitution, & Religion

User Review  - Sandy Shin - Goodreads

Should be classed as fiction, bad fiction at that. Another book I threw away. How can the man actually believe his basic tenets when he finds that he has to rewrite history in order to try to convince ... Read full review

Bibliographic information