Progress without people: in defense of Luddism
Cultural Writing. Labor History. In this ground-breaking study, newly available from Charles H. Kerr, scientific historian David F. Noble draws valuable parallels between our era of burgeoning technology and the technological advances of the industrial revolution. Proponents of technology during both eras, says Noble, argued that technological advancement was an essential, unstoppable force that would be inherently beneficial to humanity. Noble's counter-argument looks at the human costs of unchecked technological growth, along the way re-examining and redefining the meaning of Luddism.
18 pages matching point of production in this book
Results 1-3 of 18
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
actually Air Force alternative Andrew Ure automatic factory bargaining Berg Business businessmen capital capitalist central century challenge Charles Babbage collective compulsions command competitiveness consequences Containerization corporate costs defense demand deskilling direct action domination economic economists effort elimination engineers enthusiasm equipment example future human ideas increase industrial automation inevitable innovation introduction investment Kerr Kurt Vonnegut labor less Lewis Mumford Luddism Luddites machine breaking machine tool machine tool industry machinery machinist management control management's manufacturing means mechanization ment Merritt Roe Smith metalworking Mike Cooley military modern moratorium numerical control operations opposition perhaps plant point of production political present problem profit prosperity rank-and-file reality recently reflected resistance result robots role sabotage second Industrial Revolution shopfloor skills social society Stan Weir strategy struggle technical technological change technological determinism technological development technological progress technology agreements Technology Control trade unions unemployment workers