Arguing about Slavery: The Great Battle in the United States Congress

Front Cover
A.A. Knopf, 1996 - Slavery - 577 pages
12 Reviews
Here is the United States Congress in the 1830s, grappling (or trying unsuccessfully to avoid grappling) with the gravest moral dilemma inherited from the framers of the Constitution. Here is the concept (and reality) of the ownership of human beings confronting three of the most powerful ideas of the time: American republicanism, American civil liberties, American representative government. This book re-creates an episode in our past, now forgotten, that once stirred and engrossed the nation: the congressional fight over petitions against slavery. The action takes place in the House of Representatives. Beginning in 1835, a new flood of abolitionist petitions pours into the House. The powers-that-be respond with a gag rule as their means of keeping these appeals off the House floor and excluding them from national discussion. A small band of congressmen, led by former president John Quincy Adams, battles against successive versions of the gag and introduces petitions in spite of it. Then, in February 1837, Adams raises the stakes by forcing the House to cope with what he calls "The Most Important Question to come before this House since its first origin": Do slaves have the right of petition? When the Whigs take over in 1841, some expect the gag rule to be repudiated, but instead it is made permanent. A small insurgent group of Whigs, collaborating with Adams, opposes party policy and makes opposition to slavery their top priority. They constitute the seedbed for the formation of the Republican Party which will be, in the next decade, the beginning of the end of slavery. Congressional leaders try to censure Adams, and his well-publicized "trial" in the House brings the entire matter tothe nation's attention. The anti-Adams effort fails, and finally, after nine years of persistent support of the right of petition, Adams succeeds in defeating the gag rule. Throughout, one can see the gradual assembling not only of the political but also of the moral and intellectual elements for the ultimate assault on American slavery. When John Quincy Adams dies, virtually on the House floor, the young congressman Abraham Lincoln is sitting in the chamber.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

User ratings

5 stars
10
4 stars
1
3 stars
1
2 stars
0
1 star
0

Review: Arguing about Slavery: The Great Battle in the United States Congress

User Review  - Tim - Goodreads

My mouth is full right now, but I have so many things I want to say. First, I'll comment on the crackers I'm eating. Not cracked pepper, which I prefer. But dill or something. Weird tasting. Now I'll comment on this book. Good book. I liked it. Read full review

Review: Arguing about Slavery: The Great Battle in the United States Congress

User Review  - Davi Kushner - Goodreads

Awesome book- recommended for everyone. Read full review

Contents

one A Personal Introduction
3
three An Indignant Rebuke to the Fanatics
27
four Here the People Rule
42
Copyright

36 other sections not shown

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (1996)

William Lee Miller has taught at Yale University, Smith College, Indiana University, and the University of Virginia, where he is currently Miller Center of Public Affairs Scholar in Ethics and Institutions. He has been an editor and writer on a political magazine, a speechwriter, and a three-term alderman. He is the author of numerous books, most recently Arguing About Slavery, which won the D.B. Hardeman Prize for the best book on Congress.


From the Trade Paperback edition.

Bibliographic information