An introduction to the philosophy of religion
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion is the standard account of the subject for students, philosophers, and general readers.
This new, completely revised and updated edition places particular emphasis on matters which have recently become philosophically controversial. Brian Davies also provides a critical examination of the fundamental questions of religion and the ways in which these questions have been treated by such thinkers as Anselm, Aquinas, Descartes, Leibnitz, Hume, Kant, Karl Barth, and Wittgenstein.
Must a belief in God be based on argument or evidence in order to be a rational belief? Can one invoke the Free-Will Defence if one believes in God as maker and sustainer of the universe? Is it correct to think of God as a moral agent subject to duties and obligations? What is the significance of Darwin for the Argument from Design? How can one recognize God as an object of one's experience?
The author debates all these problems and more, sometimes proposing provocative answers of his own, more often leaving readers to decide for themselves.
18 pages matching assert in this book
Results 1-3 of 18
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
accept According actions actually Alvin Plantinga Anselm answer Aquinas argue argument from contingency argument from design ascribe assert body Brian Davies cause Christian claim concept conclude cosmological argument creatures D. Z. Phillips death defenders deny Descartes divine eternity evidence example explain fact follows G. E. M. Anscombe God's existence Hick human Hume Hume's Ibid impossible infer infinite instance John Kant Kenny laws of nature logically London maximal excellence mean miracles moral agent moral evil moral law morally obligatory natural law necessary notion object observe occurred ontological argument Oxford person Peter Geach Phillips philosophers Philosophy of Religion physical Plantinga position possible world premiss problem of evil Proslogion question rational religious reply Richard Swinburne seems sense experience simply someone speak statements suggest Summa Theologiae suppose talk Theism things thought timeless true truth universe verification principle words writes