Contemporary history on trial: Europe since 1989 and the role of the expert historian
Is it right for historians to serve as 'expert witnesses' to past events? Since the end of the Cold War, a series of heated and politicised debates across Europe have questioned the 'truth' about painful episodes in the twentieth century. From the Holocaust to Srebrenica, inquiries and fact-finding commissions have become a common device employed by governments to deal with the pressure of public opinion. State sponsored programmes of education and research attempt to encourage a common moral understanding of the lessons we learn from these painful memories. Contemporary historians have increasingly been drawn into these efforts since 1989 - in the courtroom, in the media, on commissions, as advisers. In a series of thoughtful essays, written by leading historians from across Europe, this volume considers the ethics and responsibilities that this new role entails. For anyone concerned with the role of the historian in contemporary society and how we arrive at a public understanding of history, this book is essential reading.
1 page matching Graziadio Isaia Ascoli venezia giulia in this book
Results 1-1 of 1
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The responsibility of the historian Peter Mandler
Public uses of history in contemporary Europe
The Bloody Sunday tribunal and the role of the historian
7 other sections not shown
academic Algerian analysis archives army Belgian Belgium Berlin bilateral commissions Bloody Sunday Bloody Sunday Inquiry British Cabinet century colonial Commission's Communist conference Congo contemporary history context countries crimes critical Croatia cultural democratic Derry Deutschland discussed documents Dutch East German Eckert Europe European example experts fact Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung French Friuli-Venezia Giulia German historians Geschichte Geschichtswissenschaft Goran Persson historical research historiography Holocaust ideological independent initiative Institute interest investigation involved issue Italian January Maurice Papon memory moral nationalist NIOD official opinion organised Paris parliamentary inquiry parties past Patrice Lumumba perspective political politicians present Prime Minister problems professional historians public debate published question Raoul Pupo recent regime relations responsibility result role scholarly scholarly-scientific scholars Second World security services sion Slovene Slovenian social society Soviet Srebrenica Stockholm Sunday Tribunal Sweden Swedish Swedish Security Services textbooks tion trial Trieste truth West Yugoslav Yugoslavia