What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
acquire action administration adopted alliance Allies Ambassador American arbitration Asiatic Austria-Hungary Baron von Holleben base belligerent blockade Britain British Bryan Caribbean Sea Central Powers China Chinese citizens coast commercial conflict connection Danish West Indies declaration defense demands desire diplomacy East economic effect Elihu Root embargo Empire ence enemy England ernment established Europe European power fact fleet foodstuffs force foreign France German government Germany Haiti Hay-Pauncefote Treaty hemisphere important independence industrial influence integrity international law islands Japan Japanese land Latin-American liner Lusitania Manchuria ment Mexico military Monroe Doctrine munitions nation naval necessity negotiations neutral rights Nicaragua ocean Open Door over-seas Pacific Panama Canal peace political ports President Wilson principles prior protect question realized refusal regarded relations republics Roosevelt Russia safety Secretary ships sion situation South America spite struggle submarine territory tion to-day trade treaty Treaty of Portsmouth United Venezuela vessels violated vital interests zone
Page 52 - Our first and fundamental maxim should be never to entangle ourselves in the broils of Europe; our second, never to suffer Europe to intermeddle with cisAtlantic affairs.
Page 52 - The question presented by the letters you have sent me is the most momentous which has ever been offered to my contemplation since that of Independence. That made us a nation; this sets our compass and points the course which we are to steer through the ocean of time opening on us.
Page 128 - China to develop and maintain for herself an effective and stable government; (3) To use their influence for the purpose of effectually establishing and maintaining the principle of equal opportunity for the commerce and industry of all nations throughout the territory of China...
Page 60 - In other words, the Monroe Doctrine is a declaration that there must be no territorial aggrandizement by any nonAmerican power at the expense of any American power on American soil.
Page 231 - The principles of international law, the practice of nations, the national safety of the United States and other nations without great military and naval establishments, the prevention of increased armies and navies, the adoption of peaceful methods for the adjustment of international differences, and, finally, neutrality itself are opposed to the prohibition by a neutral nation of the exportation of arms, ammunition, or other munitions of war to belligerent powers during the progress of the war.
Page 60 - We do not guarantee any State against punishment if it misconducts itself, provided that punishment does not take the form of the acquisition of territory by any nonAmerican power.
Page 78 - Since the Monroe Doctrine is a declaration based upon this nation's right of self-protection, it cannot be transmuted into a joint or common declaration by American states or any number of them.
Page 73 - The deep interest which we take in their independence, which we have acknowledged, and in their enjoyment of all the rights incident thereto, especially in the very important one of instituting their own governments, has been declared and is known to the world.
Page 85 - It is plain that the building of the Panama Canal greatly accentuates the practical necessity of the Monroe Doctrine as it applies to all the territory surrounding the Caribbean or near the Bay of Panama. The plainest lessons of history and the universal judgment of all responsible students of the subject concur in teaching that the potential command of the route to and from the Canal must rest with the United States and that the vital interests of the nation forbid that such command shall pass into...
Page 164 - Britain invokes the vital interests of the British Empire which are at stake in justification of its violations of the law of nations, and the neutral powers appear to be satisfied with theoretical protests, thus actually admitting the vital interests of a belligerent as a sufficient excuse for methods of waging war of whatever description. The time has come for Germany also to invoke such vital interests.