Neomedievalism, Neoconservatism, and the War on Terror
President Bush was roundly criticized for likening America’s antiterrorism measures to a “crusade” in 2001. Far from just a gaffe, however, such medievalism has become a dominant paradigm for comprehending the identity and motivations of America’s perceived enemy in the war on terror. Yet as Bruce Holsinger argues here, this cloying post-9/11 rhetoric has served to obscure the more intricate ideological machinations of neomedievalism, the global idiom of the non-state actor: non-governmental organizations, transnational corporate militias, and terrorist organizations such as al Qaeda.
Neomedievalism, Neoconservatism, and the War on Terror addresses the role of neomedievalism in contemporary politics. While international-relations theorists promote neomedievalism as a model for understanding emergent modes of global sovereignty, neoconservatives exploit its conceptual slipperiness for their own tactical ends. Holsinger concludes with a careful parsing of the Bush administration’s torture memos, which enlist neomedievalism’s model of feudal sovereignty on behalf of the abrogation of human rights.
6 pages matching discourse in this book
Results 1-3 of 6
What people are saying - Write a review
Review: Neomedievalism, Neoconservatism, and the War on TerrorUser Review - Karl Steel - Goodreads
As I recall, most useful for its final few pages, where BH engages with the Perils of 'Traveling Theory.' Would be useful to give to grad students in an intro to theory section. Read full review
Review: Neomedievalism, Neoconservatism, and the War on TerrorUser Review - Matthew - Goodreads
provocative and thoughtful. some of it was very good and some of it needs more development. also, and maybe this is jut the academic in me, the pamphlet style is interesting but still needs at least a rudimentary bibliography. Read full review