Intelligent Design: Science Or Religion? : Critical Perspectives
Robert M. Baird, Stuart E. Rosenbaum
Prometheus Books, 2007 - Religion - 338 pages
On December 20, 2005, Federal District Court Judge John E. Jones III ruled that Intelligent Design was not science but an unconstitutional intrusion of religion into the school curriculum. His decision upheld contentions by parents in the Dover, PA, school district that school board members substituted personal religious beliefs for science. The ruling came despite calls by President George W. Bush for Intelligent Design to be taught as a theory alongside the theory of evolution. This hotly contested issue continues to grip the nation and spark intense debate.
But what is Intelligent Design? Can Intelligent Design stand up to the rigors of scientific method? Or is it a nonscientific, faith-inspired interpretation of experience? This collection of essays addresses such questions and includes analyses from scientists, journalists, philosophers, and religious leaders and thinkers. This volume provides a variety of perspectives in the hope that readers will be better prepared to reach their own conclusions about the issues involved.
Divided into five sections, the first section provides analyses of Judge Jones's decision. Section two includes a report on and a response to President Bush's call for Intelligent Design to be taught in schools. The third section outlines the origins of the debate, including excerpts from the classic works of Charles Darwin and theologian William Paley. Section four analyzes the scientific validity of Intelligent Design and includes statements from key scientific associations. The highly important concluding section asks whether religion and evolution are compatible.
This essential volume features selections from: Elisabeth Bumiller, Matt Cartmill, Charles Darwin, Daniel C. Dennett, Barbara Forrest, Owen Gingerich, Stephen Jay Gould, John Paul II, Philip Kitcher, Ernan McMullen, Kenneth R. Miller, Nancey Murphy, William Paley, Robert T. Pennock, Holmes Rolston III, Michael Ruse, Alfred Tauber, Michael W. Tkacz, James Q. Wilson, and Carl Zimmer.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Debate on Intelligent Design Builds After Bush States Support for Idea
Selections from The Descent of
Creationisms Trojan Horse
9 other sections not shown
Acanthostega animals argue argument Avida Behe believe biologists Christian claims conclusion created creation Creationism's Trojan Horse creationists creatures critical cultural Darwin Dawkins Dembski digital organisms Discovery Institute divine doctrine Dover Earth ence evidence evolutionary biology evolutionary theory evolved example existence explain fact faith flagellum fossil record genes Genesis genetic God's human humanistic hypothesis ID proponents idea inquiry intelligent design theory irreducible complexity irreducibly complex issue Johnson kind knowledge living mechanism ment metaphysical Michael Behe Michael Ruse molecular molecules moral mutation Nancey Murphy natural selection natural world object observational consequences Ofria origin Pandas philosophical planet Plantinga possible predictions problem produce proteins question Raelians reason religious scientific theory scientists species statement story teaching theology theory of evolution things Thomists tion truth understanding University Wedge strategy William Dembski