Morten H. Christiansen Professor of Psychology Cornell University, Christopher Collins Professor of Linguistics Cornell University, Shimon Edelman Professor of Psychology Cornell University
Oxford University Press, Apr 1, 2007 - Psychology - 368 pages
Languages differ from one another in bewildering and seemingly arbitrary ways. For example, in English, the verb precedes the direct object ('understand the proof'), but in Japanese, the direct object comes first. In some languages, such as Mohawk, it is not even possible to establish a basic word order. Nonetheless, languages do share certain regularities in how they are structured and used. The exact nature and extent of these "language universals" has been the focus of much research and is one of the central explanatory goals in the language sciences. During the past 50 years, there has been tremendous progress, a few major conceptual revolutions, and even the emergence of entirely new fields. The wealth of findings and theories offered by the various language-science disciplines has made it more important than ever to work toward an integrated understanding of the nature of human language universals. This book is the first to examine language universals from a cross-disciplinary perspective. It provides new insights into long standing questions such as: What exactly defines the human capacity for language? Are there universal properties of human languages and, if so, what are they? Can all language universals be explained in the same way, or do some universals require different kinds of explanations from others? Language Universals is unique in starting with the assumption that the best way to approach these and related questions is through a dialogue between a wide range of disciplines, including linguistics, cognitive neuroscience, philosophy, computer science and biology.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
A Collaborative Project for the Language Sciences
2 Language Universals and UsageBased Theory
3 Universals and the Diachronic Life Cycle of Languages
4 Language Universals and the PerformanceGrammar Correspondence Hypothesis
IUniversals in Light of a Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory
The Role of the Individual in Explaining Language Universals
Whats Specific to Language and Whats Specific to Humans
8 On Semantic Universals and Typology
9 Foundations of Universal Grammar in Planned Action
approach aspects basic behavior Bever Boeckx brain Broca’s area Bybee Chapter child language Chomsky Christiansen clause Cognitive Science combinatorial complex computational constraints constructions cortex crosslinguistic derivational developmental discussion domains English evolution evolutionary example explain expressions finite Fodor formal FOXP2 function genes genetic grammaticalization Greenberg guage Hawkins Hornstein human languages hypothesis inferior frontal innate input involved Jackendoff kind language acquisition language faculty language universals learnable learner lexical linguistic universals logical meaning minimal minimalist program mirror neuron morphemes natural language nouns operations Oxford University Press parameters patterns perception phonological phrase Pinker poverty of stimulus predictions principles problem processing properties proposed psycholinguistic recursion relations representation role semantic sentences sequences speaker specific language impairment speech speech perception statistical Steedman syntactic categories syntactic structures syntax theory tion typology Universal Grammar universals of language VC dimension verb vowels word order York