Literary forgeries are usually regarded as spurious versions of genuine literature. Faking Literature argues that the production of a literary forgery is an act that reveals the spurious nature of literature itself. Literature has long been under attack because of its alliance with rhetoric (the art of persuasion) rather than with logic and ethics. One way of deflecting such attacks is to demonise literary forgery: literature acquires the illusion of authenticity by being dissociated from what are represented as ersatz approximations of the real thing.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
American ancient anonymous argues art forgery attributed Australian authenticity authorship ballads binary opposition bogus called Chatterton claim Clifford Irving collaboration copy counterfeit creative critique cultural Daniel Defoe deception Deleuze Delia Bacon Demidenko described diaries distinction edition eighteenth century enables English enquiries Ern Malley essay ethical fake literature fakelore famous fiction forged fraud Gaelic genius genuine ghostwriting Helen Darville heteronyms hoax Homer Ibid ideology imaginary imitation imposture inauthentic instance invented James James Macpherson John literary critics literary forgery literary studies London Macpherson Macphossian manuscript modern narratives novel original Ossian paper passim Paull Percy plagiarised plagiarism poems poet poetry politics practices problem produced Psalmanazar Pseudepigrapha pseudo-event pseudonym published readers revealed Review rhetoric Romantic Rowley Shakespeare Shakespeare's plays signature simulacrum society spurious stories Stratfordians term textual theory Thomas Thomas Chatterton tion translation trope Vinland Map William Wongar word written wrote