Whose justice? Which rationality?

Front Cover
University of Notre Dame Press, 1988 - Law - 410 pages
7 Reviews

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

User ratings

5 stars
5
4 stars
2
3 stars
0
2 stars
0
1 star
0

Review: Whose Justice? Which Rationality?

User Review  - Joonas - Goodreads

A thorough comparative history of three influential Western 'traditions' of moral and ethical theory that manages to stage a surprisingly strong and honest defence of Catholic Aristotelianism and ... Read full review

Review: Whose Justice? Which Rationality?

User Review  - Richard - Goodreads

Tops Read full review

Related books

Contents

Rival Justices Competing Rationalities
1
Justice and Action in the Homeric Imagination
12
The Division of the PostHomeric Inheritance
30
Copyright

18 other sections not shown

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (1988)

Although he is most widely known for his book "After Virtue" (1981), with its critique of reason and ethics, Alasdair MacIntyre writes in other areas of philosophy as well, including philosophical psychology, political theory, and philosophy of religion. Born in Scotland, he was educated at Manchester, London, and Oxford universities. In 1969, he went to the United States where he has taught at Brandeis, Boston, and Vanderbilt universities. Since 1988, when he also delivered the Gifford lectures, MacIntyre has taught at the University of Notre Dame. "After Virtue" is one of the most widely discussed of all recent books on moral philosophy. It is the culmination of MacIntyre's deep engagement with the history of ethics. In it he argues that modern ethical theory, as it has developed since the seventeenth century, has been exposed by Friedrich Nietzsche as conceptually bankrupt. To find an alternative, he looks to ancient Greece and especially to Aristotle's concept of virtue. Although his critics consider this alternative to be something of an impossible dream, MacIntyre argues that it is central to a recovery of ethics.

Bibliographic information