Critical thinking: consider the verdict
Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict shows students how to take critical thinking skills from the jury room and apply them in the voting booth and the citizens' forum, and from the shopping mall to the boardroom. This new Third Edition of Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict has been enlivened and updated with a wealth of fascinating new exercises from recent trials and Supreme Court decisions, from political campaigns and social debates. In addition, there is a new section on distinguishing legitimate from fallacious appeals to authority, expanded discussion of the proper role and function of the jury, and extensive new exercises on arguments from analogy.
49 pages matching conclusion false in this book
Results 1-3 of 49
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Seating a Jury
A FEW IMPORTANT TERMS
Premises and Conclusions
27 other sections not shown
affirming the consequent antecedent appeal to authority argue argument by analogy argument is valid asked assumptions attack Begging the question breaking or entering burden of proof categorical propositions cause certainly charged claim commit conclusion false conditional statement consider convicted Court cribbage-cheaters crime deductive argument defendant is guilty defendant's defense attorney denying the antecedent disjunction district attorney drugs euthanasia example Exercise expert eyewitness fact false dilemma gument guyonovich hominem fallacy innocent invalid Jim Larkin judge jurors jury kill legitimate look ment modus modus ponens Modus tollens moyer murder necessary and sufficient necessary condition negation obviously person premises true principle Professor Winston prosecution prove reasonable doubt relevant Robert Ransom seals are pessimists shaeffer slippery slope slippery slope fallacy smoking strawman fallacy sufficient condition Suppose testified testimony tion trial truth-value assignment Venn diagram verdict walsh warren wrong