Fundamentalist world: the new dark age of dogma

Front Cover
Icon, 2004 - Religion - 252 pages
3 Reviews
"Fundamentalism is alive and well and will affect every one of us if we don't fight it now, argues Stuart Sim."

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

Sim does better at presenting examples of what he characterises as fundamentalism than defining it, or defining what it isn't. 'Fundamentalist World' has chapters on the well worn path of religious fundamentalism, as well as other forms of fundamentalism such as political fundamentalism, market fundamentalism, nationalist fundamentalism, and others.
An interesting observation he makes is that when an ideology is observed to have failed, and the example he offers is Marxist communism, when its apologists claim that the failure is only due to the failure of the people enacting its agenda, that this is part of the fundamentalist mindset. That the ideology in its pure form is without fault, all that is needed is better execution.
In the chapter on nationalist fundamentalism, it seemed to me that Sim was over applying the charge of fundamentalism, and some of his own political convictions were exposed. In discussing Le Pen and the Front National, he characterises the statement 'We believe in the superiority of western civilisation', as a 'barely disguised code for white supremacism'. Sim also lists Pim Fortuyn as a fundamentalist nationalist. There is no section on multicultural fundamentalism (although there is a section on political correctness). There mere act of taking steps to preserve national identity and western values, be it those ultra traditionalist Catholic values espoused by Le Pen, or the libertarian values of Fortuyn, is seen, by Sim, as expressions of fundamentalism.
By the end of the book, the reader is left wondering where Sim stands politically on many of the issues he has raised, and whether he characterises being a fundamentalist with merely holding a position with any conviction, and not being a fundamentalist merely being an observer and commentator. He presents the problem, as he sees it fundamentalism, yet does not offer a clear solution other than to resist it with 'postmodern scepticism'. He doesn't seem to make the connection between this postmodernism taking away our confidence in our western civilisation, to being led down a multicultural path to more fundamentalism of the Islamic religious variety which accepts no compromise.
 

Review: Fundamentalist World: The New Dark Age of Dogma

User Review  - Imran Rasid - Goodreads

The book mentioned few important points on what really constituted the fundamentalist movement in the modern era. I like the fact the he move beyond the narrow categorical relationship that often put ... Read full review

Contents

The Fundamentalist Mentality
20
Fundamentalism in History
31
Time Warp Zones
59
Copyright

8 other sections not shown

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information