What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
admit adopted Alexandria Alexandrine ancient appears appellate jurisdiction Aristotle authority Bonaparte cause character citizens clause common compact Congress considered Constitution Convention declare deluges doctrine doubt duties edition Epicurus Eusebius exclusive exercise existence expressed Fabr favour Federal Federalist feeling foreign France French friends give Greek Griesbach happiness honour inferior interest Jonson Josephine judges judicial power judiciary justice labour legislature liberty limestone Louis XIV Madame Madison manuscripts means ment mind moral nature never Nolan object observations old red sandstone opinion original parties philosophy phrenology Plato political possess present preserved principles protection purpose Pythagoras question reason regulate rendered resolution says shew society South-Carolina Southern Review sovereign sovereignty strata supposed Supreme Court tariff tariff of 1824 Testament thing tion treaty tribunals Union United usurpation versions violation Virginia votes Vulgate Webster whole words
Page 176 - ... in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise :hese That of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the States who are parties thereto have the right and are in duty bound to interpose, for arresting the progress of the evil and for maintaining within their respective limits the authorities, rights, and liberties appertaining to them.
Page 100 - I loved the man, and do honour his memory, on this side idolatry, as much as any. He was (indeed) honest, and of an open and free nature; had an excellent phantasy, brave notions, and gentle expressions...
Page 165 - States are parties, as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting that compact; as no further valid than they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact ; and that, in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers not granted by the said compact, the States, who are parties thereto, have the right and are in duty bound to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits the authorities,...
Page 100 - I remember the players have often mentioned it as an honour to Shakespeare that in his writing (whatsoever he penned) he never blotted out a line.
Page 170 - Having constituted the government, and declared its powers, the people have further said that since somebody must decide on the extent of these powers, the government shall itself decide, subject always, like other popular governments, to its responsibility to the people. And now, sir, I repeat, how is it that a state legislature acquires any power to interfere?
Page 440 - On the other hand it is perfectly clear that the sovereign powers vested in the state governments, by their respective constitutions, remained unaltered and unimpaired, except so far as they were granted to the government of the United States.
Page 165 - The states then being the parties to the constitutional compact, and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity, that there can be no tribunal above their authority, to decide in the last resort, whether the compact made by them be violated...
Page 465 - Executive and a convenient number of the National Judiciary, ought to compose a council of revision with authority to examine every act of the National Legislature before it shall operate, and every act of a particular Legislature before a Negative thereon shall be final; and that the dissent of the said Council shall amount to a rejection, unless the Act of the National Legislature be again passed, or that of a particular Legislature be again negatived by of the members of each branch.
Page 170 - But who shall decide this question of interference ? To whom lies the last appeal ? This, sir, the constitution itself decides also, by declaring " that the judicial power shall extend to all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States.