Hegel After Derrida
Psychology Press, 1998 - Philosophy - 356 pages
Hegel After Derrida provides a much needed insight not only into the importance of Hegel and the importance of Derrida's work on Hegel, but also the very foundations of postmodern and deconstructionist thought. It will be essential reading for all those engaging with the work of Derrida and Hegel today and anyone seeking insight into some of the basic but neglected themes of deconstruction.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Hegel at the Court of the Ashanti
Of Spirits and Wills
The Surprise of the Event
The End of Art with the Mask
Eating My God
AFTER HEGEL AFTER DERRIDA
The Remnants of Philosophy Psychoanalysis after Glas
HegelMarx Consciousness and Life
Absolute Knowledge abstract Africans Alexandre Kojeve Andrzej Warminski Antigone appears arbitrariness argues articulation Ashanti Aufhebung Bataille become Bowdich brother and sister Charles de Brosses Christianity comedy concept consciousness constitutes contradiction critical critique culture death deconstruction Derrida's reading desire determinate negation dialectic discourse discussion divine end of art essay essence essential ethical event feminine fetishism figure freedom Freud G. W. F. Hegel Geist Genet Glas Hegel's text Hegelian philosophy Hegelian system Heidegger holocaust human idealism ideology interpretation irony Jacques Derrida Jean Hyppolite Jesus Kant Kantian knowing Kojeve language Lectures logic Marx mask means metaphysics movement nature negativity object passage Phenomenology of Spirit Philosophy of Right play political possible postmodern precisely psychoanalysis pure question reading of Hegel relation religion remains repression self-consciousness sense Sittlichkeit slave speculative structure substance thought trans transcendental transition translation truth unity University Press Werner Hamacher
Page 4 - ... hebt sich auf; is sublated) by citing its own statements in a second-level discourse (autonymy) that functions to legitimate them. This is as much as to say that, in its immediacy, denotative discourse bearing on a certain referent (a living organism, a chemical property, a physical phenomenon, etc.) does not really know what it thinks it knows.