The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions (Google eBook)
This carefully considered book is a welcome addition to the debate over "judicial activism." Constitutional scholar Kermit Roosevelt III offers an elegantly simple way to resolve the heated discord between conservatives, who argue that the Constitution is immutable, and progressives, who insist that it is a living document that must be reinterpreted in new cultural contexts so that its meaning evolves. Roosevelt uses plain language and compelling examples to explain how the Constitution can be both a constant and an organic document.
Recent years have witnessed an increasing drumbeat of complaints about judicial behavior, focusing particularly on Supreme Court decisions that critics charge are reflections of the Justices' political preferences rather than enforcement of the Constitution. The author takes a balanced look at these controversial decisions through a compelling new lens of constitutional interpretation. He clarifies the task of the Supreme Court in constitutional cases, then sets out a model to describe how the Court creates doctrine to implement the meaning of the Constitution. Finally, Roosevelt uses this model to show which decisions can be justified as legitimate and which cannot.
What people are saying - Write a review
Review: The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court DecisionsUser Review - Vanessa - Goodreads
In a few instances it feels like the author is overstating his case, but this is a really readable, clear-eyed analysis of some of the noise and spin surrounding the Supreme Court lately. Also just a ... Read full review
abortion activist aﬀected aﬃrmative action allow American answer anti-deferential argued argument asserted Black Bush Casey citizens commerce conﬂict Congress constitutional meaning costs and beneﬁts Courtís decision decide deference deferential detainees diﬀerent diﬃcult discrimination discuss dissenting doctrinal rule doctrinal test doctrine and meaning Dred Scott Due Process Clause eﬀect Eighth Amendment enforcement Equal Protection Clause Establishment Clause Executive fact factors federal government ﬁnd ﬁrst ﬁt Florida Florida Supreme Court Fourteenth Amendment gay marriage gays and lesbians Gore governmental Hamdi homosexual Ibid illegitimate interest issue judges judgment judicial activism Justice Kelo Korematsu legislative legislature legitimacy legitimate liberty Lochner Mark Levin Men in Black ment Miranda oﬀered oﬃcials opinion originalists plain meaning Plessy political prohibits punishment question Rasul ratiﬁers reason reﬂecting religious Romer Scalia segregation signiﬁcance speciﬁc speech stitution strict scrutiny substantial suggest Supreme Court tion understanding University Press unjustiﬁed uphold violated vote women