6 pages matching optimum k value in this book
Results 1-3 of 6
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
95 percent confidence analysis annoyance ratings annoyance scores APPENDIX best k value Bruel and KJaer car noise City of Toronto confidence interval Correlation Coefficient CURVES FOR REPRESENTATIVE dependence of Annoyance deviation of levels Dissatisfaction Score distribution of noise Environmental Noise expression Leq Follow-Up Survey Gaussian and non-Gaussian Gaussian distributions Gaussian or non-Gaussian Il-b indicated Leisure Environment Loudspeakers mean levels mean noise level mean sound levels moderately annoying Noise Pollution Level noise ratings non-Gaussian distribution non-Gaussian noise distributions non-Gaussian types optimum k value PROBABILITY DENSITY CURVES Program Il-a Program in Transportation questionnaire quiet Regression Analysis REPRESENTATIVE TAPES response to noise Robinson Ref shown on Fig Sound Level Meter statistical significance subjective response subjective scores TAPES OF PROGRAM three programs Toronto Noise Study Toronto-York University Joint total 6 minutes traffic noise signals traffic noise tapes truck noise UNIVERSITY JOINT PROGRAM University of Toronto University of Toronto-York urban traffic noise UTIAS York University