The Two-source Hypothesis: A Critical Appraisal |
Contents
THE CASE FOR THE PRIORITY OF MARK | 21 |
THE CASE AGAINST THE PRIORITY OF MARK | 95 |
Lachmanns Argument | 119 |
Copyright | |
20 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
agreements between Matthew agreements of Matthew Aramaic argument from order B. C. Butler B. H. Streeter baptism common source common to Matthew conflation context criticism dependence on Matthew disciples discourse document Double Tradition E. P. Sanders editorial essay evangelists evidence example explained fact Four Gospels Gospel of Matthew Gospel of Thomas Greek Griesbach hypothesis Kümmel Lachmann literary Lukan Luke against Mark Luke's Mark and Luke Mark and Q Mark's order Markan priority Matthean Matthew and Luke Matthew and Mark Matthew or Luke ment narrative order of Q original parable parallel pericopes priority of Mark Proto-Matthew Q hypothesis Q material question sayings of Jesus scholars Sermon story suggests Synoptic Gospels Synoptic Problem Testament theory thew and Luke Triple Tradition two-document hypothesis two-source hypothesis Ur-Markus verses W. R. Farmer words written source αὐτοῦ δὲ ἐν καὶ