The Second Nuclear Age
Taking issue with the complacent belief that a happy mixture of deterrence, arms control, and luck will enable humanity to cope adequately with weapons of mass destruction (WMD), the author of this study argues that the risk posed by WMD is ever more serious. Policy that ignores the nuclear age, he cautions, is policy that ignores reality.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
argue argument arms control ballistic BC weapons biological century challenge Chapter chemical weapons China claim Clausewitz clear Cold Cold War condition conflict cope curity defeat dominant fallacy friends and allies future global Gray hegemonic hypothesis information-led international security least less logic matter menace militarily missile defenses motives NATO Nonetheless nonproliferation North Korea nuclear acquisition nuclear armament nuclear deterrence nuclear option nuclear proliferation nuclear strategy nuclear taboo nuclear weapons nuclear-armed forces options peer competitor perils plausible policymakers political context potential probably problem Quinlan regional power reliable rence Revolution in Military risk rogue Russia Sagan scholars second nuclear age significant Soviet START II statecraft strategic culture strategic effect strategic history strategic nuclear superpower targets theorists theory third nuclear age tion toxin U.S. Congress U.S. conventional U.S. nuclear forces U.S. strategic unipolar United USSR virtual nuclear arsenals warfare weaponry Western world politics would-be