The Agnostic Inquirer: Revelation from a Philosophical Standpoint

Front Cover
Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, Sep 19, 2007 - Philosophy - 331 pages

Is there a good God? And if there is, has that God revealed anything of significance to us? Philosophers pondering these two questions have automatically assumed that the first must be answered before the second. Sandra Menssen and Thomas Sullivan examine how God's voice can be heard in the content of revelatory claims, stories, myths, poetry, exhortations, legal codes, and more. They argue that rather than taking the written word of any religion out of the philosophical proof equation, those very words should be considered as the voice of the God accused of not existing. The Agnostic Inquirer makes a clear, analytical claim that without these revelatory words, atheists and agnostics are missing a large part of the relevant database of the existence of God, while many theists are working with an impoverished database in trying to explain the foundations of their faith.

 

Contents

A Preferable Philosophical Approach to the Great Question
62
34
84
Inquiry into Revelatory Claims Is Pointless
123
No Acceptable Method Exists for Assessing
171
Revelatory Claims Lack Adequate Explanatory Power
223
The Requirement of Faith Invalidates
288
Index
324
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2007)

Sandra Menssen is professor of philosophy at University ofSt. Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Bibliographic information