Irony and Politeness: Softening or Enhancing Face-Threats (Google eBook)
Irony in politeness theories was at first considered as a tool to save the face of the addressee, but later research challenged this view as will be shown in this paper. The use of irony can easily become a tightrope walk for the speaker between being friendly and funny or being rude and offending. Irony can also be challenging for the addressee, if a situation is ambiguous and if he or she therefore must find out how a remark is meant to be understood. Since irony is an indirect way of saying what one is thinking it often leads to misunderstandings or awkward situations. However, irony might also be used very well directed and purposeful. For instance, irony is often used when criticizing someone and can in this case fulfill either the function of enhancing or reducing the criticism. Some researchers, however, disagree about the function of irony in this context. Is irony now a face-saving tool or does it help to attack face? What are the determining factors to decide this, if at all such factors can be found? How do different researchers understand the function of irony in politeness theories, and can some similarities between the different approaches be found? These are questions that shall be answered in this paper. The politeness theories of Brown and Levinson (1987) and Leech (1991) will provide a basis for these considerations and will be complemented by newer surveys. In spite of the different statements made by various researchers in their theories and surveys, irony seems to not only have a face-saving function. When sarcasm is understood as a subordinate form of irony then irony can be used very well to also attack face.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Uses and Processing of Irony and Sarcasm: A Special Issue of Metaphor ...
Albert N. Katz
No preview available - 2000
Other editions - View all
addressee ask the money attack face Banter Principle big sissy Britannica Online 2006 Brown and Levinson Calvin Calvin and Hobbes Colston conveyed indirectly Cooperative Principle criticism less criticize someone Culpeper Dews and Winner Dews et a1 Dews et al early today employee employee’s remark Encyclopaedia Britannica Online face wants face-threatening act ﬁnd ﬁrst form of irony function of irony Gricean Maxim implicature indirect inﬂuence instance intended meaning interaction interpreted as banter Ironic Compliments ironic form ironic remarks ironic utterance irony and politeness Irony and Sarcasm Irony Principle Joey Joey’s lawnmower Leech linguistic literal criticism literal insult literal meaning Minimize mock politeness negative politeness non-intimate contexts obviously insincere offensive point Phoebe and Mike Politeness Principle positive face positive politeness record act redressive action sarcasm saying the opposite situation Slugoski and Turnbull social speaker says spoiling the children sub-maxim superficial level superﬁcially impolite superficially polite Tinge Hypothesis understood verbal irony