What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
IT A REVIEW 0? THE EXPERIMENTAL LITERATURE
THE GROUPS STUDIED MATERIAL AND TECHNIQUES
11 other sections not shown
ability Appendix assertion of key Aural Skills Dictation Coefficient of Correlation compared with errors Complex Complex Complex Context Scale complex settings showed Contextual Categories Contextual Settings Errors descending direction Differences Between Melodic differences in percentage Ear Training Error Differences errors in sightsinging errors in singing explanation and frequency frequency distributions harmonic interval as sung interval errors Isolated and Contextual Isolated Intervals Criterion Isolated Item isolation to determine items were compared key center lsolated ltems major or minor Major Sixth melodic items minor second Minor Seventh Minor Third moderately complex settings musical number of errors percent level percentage of errors Perfect Fifth Perfect Fourth Preliminary Sightsinging Test Relationship Between Isolated reliability rhythmic error rhythmic units sets of melodic Seventh ascending shown in Table sightsinging this interval Significance of Error significant differences Simple Context Skills Dictation Test Standard Deviation Subject sung in isolation tonal tonic underlined are significant values are shown Values underlined