Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy
News stories and academic studies often focus on the options chosen by a president and his officials during a crisis. Central to such decisions, however, are the forces that determine what options show up on the agenda and what options do not even make it to the table. "Imperial Brain Trust," published in 1977, is the classic study of the Council on Foreign Relations, an organization that has, for decades, played a central behind the scenes role is shaping such foreign policy choices. This private club and think tank, bringing together the New York establishment and the Washington foreign policy elite as well as other powerful forces, took the lead in laying out the plans for post-World II international order. The Council also traced the key guidelines for Cold War intervention and vetted and advised generations of White House officials. Rival think tanks, such as the far-right Heritage Foundation, now have a higher profile. But the Council on Foreign Relations continues to mark the boundaries of what insiders consider to be respectable foreign policy discussion, helping aspirants to policy influence test out their schemes for establishment approval.
..".A thoroughly researched expose of the discreet workings of the powerful Council on Foreign Relations...an influential oligarchy which not only studies but forms U.S. policy. With keen insight, the authors trace the origins of the increased power of the organization..."
..".the first in-depth analysis of the activities and influence of the most important private institution in the formulation of U.S. foreign policy...Shoup and Minter's work is based on detailed research, including examination of material hitherto unavailable to the public...this work will stand as a milestone."
What people are saying - Write a review
It is the opposite to DKs review, it actually takes a critical look at what 'went on behind the scenes' - very informative. Chomsky would probably applaud this book for it's honesty and access for people to what would usually be classified information.
DK if you are such a fan of Chomsky, and have taken on board his warnings about being critical, you would find that even books which do portray an old-school propaganda can be useful to demonstrate and back up claims against them in academic work. In this, hardly any literature is irrelevant/not useful in some way.
This is for those who still believe the high school civics classes of the 50's and 60's which taught that America was a benign nation interested only in freedom and justice for all - here and abroad.
If imperialism was the wolf and neo-colonialism was the fox, then neo-imperialism is certainly the vicious night-hunting hyena.
It speaks volumes that there is NO REVIEW of this book. Chomsky's "The Manufacturing of Consent" certainly explains a lot of it.