The Tolerant Society
Oxford University Press, Apr 10, 1986 - Freedom of speech - 307 pages
The First Amendment provides Americans with a far broader protection of free speech than that available in any other Western democracy, Lee Bollinger notes, and yet other democracies are not seen as significantly less open or more restrictive that the United States. Why do Americans guarantee people the right to advocate the overthrow of the government or advance racist or genocidal ideas? Why, for example, protect the right of neo-Nazis to march in predominantly Jewish Skokie, Illinois? In The Tolerant Society, Bollinger offers a masterful critique of the major theories of freedom of expression, and offers an alternative explanation. Traditional justifications for protecting extremist speech have turned largely on the inherent value of self-expression, maintaining that the benefits of the free interchange of ideas include the greater likelihood of serving truth and of promoting wise decisions in a democracy. Bollinger finds these theories persuasive but inadequate. Buttrressing his argument with references to the Skokie case and many other examples, as well as a careful analysis of the primary literature on free speech, he contends that the real value of toloeration of extremist speech lies in the extraordinary self-control toward antisocial behavior that it elicits: society is stengthened by the exercise of tolerance, he maintains. The problem of finding an appropriate response--especially when emotions make measured response difficult--is common to all social interaction, Bollinger points out, and there are useful lesons to be learned from withholding punishment even for what is conceded to be bad behavior. About the Author: Lee C. Bollinger is Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Enslaved to Freedom?
The Classical Model and Its Limits
The Fortress Model and Its Limits
The Quest for the Tolerant Mind
The Internal Dialectic of Tolerance
Drawing Lines and the Virtues of Ambiguity
Searching for the Right Voice
An Agenda for the General Tolerance Theory
Abrams ACLU act of tolerance Alexander Bickel Alexander Meiklejohn Amendment anti-Semitism argument attitudes basic beliefs capacity censorship chap Chaplinsky chapter citizens claim concern constitutional context decision defendants democracy democratic discussion dissent doctrine excessive intolerance expression extremist speech fact feelings fighting words fortress model free speech idea free speech principle free speech theory freedom of speech function of free harm Holmes Holmes's human important incitement individual injury intellectual interest involved issues Jewish Defense League Jews judges judicial Kalven libel liberty limits majority meaning Meiklejohn mind Nazi Nazism Neier nonspeech behavior obscenity opinion political potential premises principle of free problem prohibit protection punishment racial reason regulation response risk role seeking seems self-government self-restraint sense Skokie society speech activity speech behavior suppression Supreme Court tendency thought tolerance truth values Wigmore York Times Co
In Defense of American Liberties: A History of the ACLU
No preview available - 1999
All Book Search results »
Prophetic Tradition and Radical Rhetoric in America
James F. Darsey
Limited preview - 1999