Triumphant plutocracy: the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920 (Google eBook)

Front Cover
The Academy Press, 1921 - United States - 445 pages
1 Review
  

What people are saying - Write a review

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

Agree with another reviewer, Brett, that some of the hot button issues Pettigrew talks about are completely foreign to me, so I have no idea what's at stake or why I should care so much. My eyes kinda glaze over then.
But I'm a history buff and I've long suspected that something terrible happened to America in two stages.. from around Civil War time to 1870ish and then 1870ish to 1920.
This book confirms it.
This is absolute must reading for anyone who wants to live in truth. Just understand - the truth is really, really, unpleasant.
What is that truth?
Well, in a nutshell:
The Civil War did free the slaves...
but it also freed corporate powers to take over the American Republic.
By 1920, corporate powers have complete and totalitarian control of our nation: education, the financial system, the banks, the monetary system, every institution of significance, every industry of significance, the military. everything, even public opinion is theirs to manage.
Essentially we - all of us - all of America..
we are all WAGE-SLAVES working for invisible puppetmasters.
With that knowledge, try to enjoy your day!
 

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 333 - Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves; and under the rule of a just God cannot long retain it." I believe that is true. I believe the reflex action upon our own people of the conquest of other peoples and their
Page 164 - proceedings illustrate this point; they are typical, and are as follows: P. 78. Sherman of Connecticut said: "The people should have as little to do as may be about the Government. They want information and are constantly liable to be misled." Gerry, of Massachusetts: "The evil we experience flows from the excess of democracy.
Page 336 - liberty and the pursuit of happiness." This they said, and this they meant. They did not mean to assert the obvious untruth that all were actually then enjoying that equality, not yet that they were about to confer it immediately upon them. In fact, they had no power to confer such a boon. They meant simply to
Page 320 - subscribed to the following oath or affirmation: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm), in the presence of Almighty God, that I will support the constitution, laws and government of the Republic of Hawaii; and will not, either directly or indirectly, encourage or assist in the restoration or establishment of a monarchial form of government in the Hawaiian Islands.
Page 12 - in any State or Territory having public land bearing forests in any part of the public lands wholly or in part covered with timber or undergrowth, whether of commercial value or not as public reservations and the President shall by public proclamation declare the establishment of such reservations and the limits thereof.
Page 166 - of speech, or of the press, or of the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." It is amazing that this great basic principle of
Page 103 - 2. That any common carrier failing to make such report within thirty days after the end of any month shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof by a court of competent jurisdiction, shall be punished by a fine of
Page 335 - theology is fast .joining the cry. . . . "I think the authors of that notable instrument intended to include all men; they did not mean to say all were equal in color, size, intellect, moral
Page 103 - 3. That neither said report nor any part thereof shall be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose against such railroad so making such report in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report. "Sec. 4. That the Interstate Commerce Commission is authorized to prescribe for such common carriers a method and form for making the reports in the
Page 172 - to act on constitutional questions, because the laws of meum and tuum and of criminal action, forming the great mass of the system of law, constitute their particular department. When the legislative or executive functionaries act unconstitutionally, they are responsible to the people in their elective capacity. The

Bibliographic information