Trial: advocacy before judges, jurors, and arbitrators
Many of these strategies and skills also apply to preparing and presenting a case before an administrative-tribunal, a government agency, a hearing examiner, an arbitrator, and other fact finders in other forums. Many of these approaches apply to other lawyering experiences, including presentations before public and private organizations such as boards, legislative bodies, and other decision makers. Presents numerous examples and illustrations of lawyers making statements, examining witnesses, and presenting arguments. These examples reflect the broad range of civil and criminal cases and bring some reality to the explanation of the trial process.
Try this search over all volumes: Netherlands
Results 1-0 of 0
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
accident administrative hearings admissible advocate answer appear approach ask questions bench trial burden of proof challenge for cause client closing argument conduct courtroom credibility criminal cross-examination decision maker defendant defendant's describe determine direct examination document effective establish event evidentiary Examining Attorney Examining lawyer exhibits expert explain fact finder factual favorable Fed.R.Evid Federal Rule happened hearsay Honor impeachment improper inadmissible evidence introduced involved issues judge or arbitrator judgment jurisdictions jury instructions jury selection jury trial leading questions ment motion in limine Objecting Lawyer offered opening statement opinion opposing attorney opposing counsel opposing party panel party admission peremptory challenges permit person persuasive plaintiff prepared present present sense impression pretrial procedures prospective jurors prove reasonable rebuttal record relevant request require response rules of evidence Section specific story summary summation tell testify testimony theory tion trial or hearing unfairly prejudicial usually verdict form witness