Bus Route Evaluation StandardsProvides updated information to the 1984 United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) report entitled Bus Service Evaluation Methods: A Review, however, the results are not directly comparable as the respondents, questions asked, and analytical procedures differ in the 1994 synthesis. It does report what agencies do in the area of bus route, not system, evaluation standards, and how they undertake these efforts. |
From inside the book
17 pages matching Department of Transportation in this book
Where's the rest of this book?
Results 1-3 of 17
Contents
SUMMARY | 1 |
CHAPTER THREE RESPONDENTS USE OF SERVICE STANDARDS | 9 |
CHAPTER FOUR THE ADMINISTRATION OF BUS SERVICE | 23 |
3 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
1,000 buses buses 50 buses alternate pick bus route evaluation Bus Service Evaluation Bus stop siting bus stop spacing buses 51 buses buses Total Calgary Transit Chicago Transit Authority collecting route cost per passenger criterion was reported data collection deadhead Department of Transportation elover ex officio far-side Federal Transit Administration Frequency of route headway adherence measure METRO minimally acceptable standard Minimum intervals monitoring Number of Properties Number of Respondents OMNITRANS on-time performance paratransit passenger comfort passenger trips Passengers per hour percent Pierce Transit Population density Properties Not Reporting question questionnaire REGION ride checks riders ridership route design standards route evaluation standards route level route's service delivery Service equity Service Standards set per alternate sets per pick span of service Sunday point survey synthesis system average TCRP TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION total number traffic checkers transfer transit agencies Transit Authority transit industry transit systems Transportation Research Board U.S. Department variable cost versus