A Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law (Google eBook)
"An incisive consideration of the Supremes, offering erudite yet accessible clues to legal thinking on the most important level."--Kirkus ReviewsIn this authoritative reckoning with the eighteen-year record of the Rehnquist Court, Georgetown law professor Mark Tushnet reveals how the decisions of nine deeply divided justices have left the future of the Court; and the nation; hanging in the balance. Many have assumed that the chasm on the Court has been between its liberals and its conservatives. In reality, the division was between those in tune with the modern post-Reagan Republican Party and those who, though considered to be in the Court's center, represent an older Republican tradition. As a result, the Court has modestly promoted the agenda of today's economic conservatives, but has regularly defeated the agenda of social issues conservatives; while paving the way for more radically conservative path in the future.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Clarence Thomass Constitution
Ruth Bader Ginsburgs Equal Protection Clause
Antonin Scalias First Amendment
Anthony Kennedy and Gay Rights
The Religious Rights AgendaSymbols and Money
Race Affirmative Action and Crime
The Federalism Revolution
Other editions - View all
abortion activists affirmative action affirmative action programs African Americans Amendment Anthony Kennedy Antonin Scalia appeals Blackmun Bork Brennan Breyer Burger challenge city’s civil rights Clarence Thomas clause Congress conservative Constitution’s constitutional law couldn’t Court’s Court’s decision cross burning David Souter decided Democrats developed didn’t discrimination dissent economic federalism revolution Federalist Society gay rights gender Ginsburg government’s ibid idea important issues judge judicial activism justices Kennedy Kennedy’s law clerks law school lawyers legislatures liberal limited litigation majority ment Nixon nomination O’Connor opinion overrule Roe Palazzolo political position prayer problem protection punitive damages question Quoted race racial Reagan reason regulations Rehnquist Court Religious Right Republican Scalia Scouts Senate social Souter state’s statute Supreme Court there’s Thomas’s thought tion unconstitutional violated Virginia VMI’s vote voucher programs wanted Warren Court White Whren woman women wrote